You can perform a Monte-Carlo-Integration of the credible intervals of each group represented by beta distributions to calculate the probability that the true unknown parameter of one group is better than the true unknown parameter of another group. I've done something similar in this question How does a frequentist calculate the chance that group A beats group B regarding binary response where trials=Visitors and successful trials = conversions
BUT:
Beware that Bayes will give you only subjective probabilities depending on the data collected so far, not the objective "truth". This is rooted in the difference in philosophy between frequentists (which use statistical tests, p-values etc) and Bayesians. Hence you cannot expect to detect a significant difference using Bayes when
the statistical procedures fail to do so.
To understand why this matters it might help to learn the difference between the confidence interval and the credible interval first, since the above mentioned MC-Integration "only" compares two indepent credible intervals with each other.
For further details on this topic see e.g. this questions: