Tell me more ×
Cross Validated is a question and answer site for statisticians, data analysts, data miners and data visualization experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have the following small data:

father <- c(NA, NA, NA, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4)
mother <- c(NA, NA, NA, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 3, 4, 4)
idd <- c(1:11)
yvar <- rnorm(11, 5, 2)
xvar <- c(1,1,2, 1,2,1, 1,1, 2, 1,2)
mydf <- data.frame (father, mother, idd, yvar, xvar)

require(kinship)
kmat <- kinship(mydf$idd, mydf$father,mydf$mother)

           1     2    3     4     5     6     7     8      9     10    11
    1  0.500 0.000 0.00 0.250 0.250 0.500 0.250 0.250 0.0000 0.1250 0.250
    2  0.000 0.500 0.00 0.250 0.250 0.000 0.250 0.250 0.2500 0.1250 0.250
    3  0.000 0.000 0.50 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2500 0.2500 0.000
    4  0.250 0.250 0.00 0.500 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.1250 0.2500 0.500
    5  0.250 0.250 0.00 0.250 0.500 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.1250 0.1250 0.250
    6  0.500 0.000 0.00 0.250 0.250 0.750 0.250 0.250 0.0000 0.1250 0.250
    7  0.250 0.250 0.00 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.500 0.250 0.1250 0.1250 0.250
    8  0.250 0.250 0.00 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.500 0.1250 0.1250 0.250
    9  0.000 0.250 0.25 0.125 0.125 0.000 0.125 0.125 0.5000 0.1875 0.125
    10 0.125 0.125 0.25 0.250 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.1875 0.5000 0.250
    11 0.250 0.250 0.00 0.500 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.1250 0.2500 0.750

This is example of inbred pedigree in plants where anything can be father or mother or vice versa. Even a single individual can be hermaphrodite (both mother and father) under-selfing. Even in this situation the relatedness between individual 1 with individual 1 should be 0.5. Is there any correct-way to correct this problem of kinship matrix estimation?

The mixed model fitting using lmekin function from kinship package is giving the following error:

require(kinship) 
model1 <- lmekin(yvar ~  xvar , random = ~ 1|idd, varlist=list(kmat), data = mydf)
    Warning message:
In coxme.varcheck(ncluster, varlist, n, gvars, groups, sparse, rescale,  :
  Diagonal of variance matrix is not constant
share|improve this question

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted
+50

Try with rescale=FALSE, which I think you want anyway.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.