# Visualising successive proportions

I am trying to visualise some consumer data, which has 4 categories. Users are free to switch between different categories. I would like to visualise the last three or four switches for each individual.

So we would start with a plot with a column with 4 stacked proportions. After that we would have 16 as each category breaks down into what people did on the previous occasion, then 64, and so on, until the bins become too small to be useful.

I am thinking somewhere between a marimekko chart and a stacked barchart or a dendro gram should work, but I don't even know what that would be called!

If anyone can help with the type of plot I should be using, and, if you want to be extra nice, how to implement it in R then I would be very grateful.

-
What about network analysis? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_network#Social_network_analysis –  Roman Luštrik Dec 8 '11 at 13:59
Right idea, but wrong kind of data for that. I want to get a column with proportions, then break each proportion down iteratively, to show the predeccesors. –  Simon Hayward Dec 8 '11 at 14:01
Is the order of the switches relevant? I'm thinking that you might just have 12 different values: the number that made a switch (at any point in time) from cat.1 to 2, 3, or 4, cat. 2 to 1, 3, or 4, and so on. Then you could visualize this with four circles for the different categories, and arrows going back and forth between the circles, and the relative size of the arrows showing the number of switches. –  Jonathan Dec 9 '11 at 1:24
Of course, if the order is relevant, you can do this same graphic for each point in time. The changing size of the circles would then show the changes in each category over time. –  Jonathan Dec 9 '11 at 1:25

One potential idea is the use of Sankey diagrams to document the flow of choices between the categories. Two examples to describe what I am talking about are;

With an update over some of your concerns expressed in the comments. It appears to me that the Parallel Sets program does what you want out of the box. Below is an output of the program, in which I created 4 random variables with 4 categories. Whatever group you initialize to the top of the display will be sequentially divided among the subsequent categories. Creating the splitting down that you desire.

Also not apparent in this picture the package has some interactive functionality that allows for easier exploratory data analysis, such as when you hover over one of the categories all of it's descendants are highlighted.

I have uploaded the same dataset to Fineo which you can explore here. Besides the initial 4 category variables (named dec1 to dec4) I have also included the concatenated categories that allows you to examine the split categories. The naming convention for the variables with the exp suffix is that it is the dec variable expanded by concatenating the previous chosen categories. So dec3_exp12 would be labeled as 121 if dec1 = 1 and dec2 = 2 and dec3 = 1. You could make the same split type structure in Fineo that is available in ParSets, but it fails to render the categories with $4^3$ or more nodes in this example.

After playing around with Fineo abit more it is a neat application, but it is really limited. Parallel Sets has much more functionality, so I would suggest you check that out before the Fineo app.

I think the ParSets program is a much better option than the successively splitting the categories into subsets for examination. For an example, using the same random data as above, here is a dot plot plotting the proportion categories in decision 2 chosen conditional on the category chosen for decision 1.

You can do the same breakdown for the change from decision 2 to decision 3, but make a small multiple chart for what the initial decision 1 was.

You can continue this on infinitely (see below). It may be enlightening, but I suspect it would be fairly daunting by the time you get to many more panels. Below is as requested, visualizing 4 successive category choices.

As noted previously, the small numbers by the time you split your graphic into so many categories is problematic. One way to account for that is to map an aesthetic such as size to the baseline in which the proportion is based off of. This shrinks the observations based on smaller numbers from view. You could also use transparency (but I already made the points transparent to distinguish overplotted points in this example).

I imagine some were envisioning a Christmas tree like node structure as opposed to dot plots, but I don't know how to make such a graphic. I suspect it would be suspect to the same overwhelming problem though. These small multiples aren't bad, but IMO the Parallel Sets is alot more intuitive and I suspect some non-obvious patterns would be more apparent in that visualization. Maybe someone more imaginative than me can come up with some more interesting data than just 4 random categories.

-
That looks very helpful, thankyou. –  Simon Hayward Dec 8 '11 at 14:37
@SimonHayward, post back with some examples if you come up with more interesting visualizations. –  Andy W Dec 8 '11 at 14:38
Hmmmm, actually, I think this is not going to work. Because the classes within each of the 5 categories are the same this is going to group objects back together, whereas I want them to divide more and more finely. So I have to untick the answer! I can't even rate your answer up at the mo! But the post was interesting and useful anyway! –  Simon Hayward Dec 8 '11 at 15:32
Sort of like a directed graph with nodes at each level, splitting down. With each branch weighted. The trouble is that I don't know the name of what I am asking for, so it makes the question hard to answer! –  Simon Hayward Dec 8 '11 at 15:35
@SimonHayward, I've updated with a few more examples. It appears the Parallel sets application has the behavior you want as opposed to the Fineo application. –  Andy W Dec 9 '11 at 19:42