Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am undergraduate student and I have a problem in my research. Recently, my supervisor told me that if using secondary data no need to perform normality test, why? It is got any citation or previous research prove this?

share|improve this question

The need to perform a normality test has nothing to do with the data source, in general. And the reasons for doing normality tests (which are sometimes not sensitive enough to detect non-normality) are few, especially once your know about nonparametric/robust methods. Nonparametric (rank-based) methods are often more powerful than parametric methods that rely on normality assumptions.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.