Tell me more ×
Cross Validated is a question and answer site for statisticians, data analysts, data miners and data visualization experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Essentially, I have two collinear variables which could be seen as either random or as fixed effects, a dependent variable I'm fitting the model to, and a variable that's assuredly a random effect.

Dependent var: Number of neuron spikes (FiringRate) in a specific region of mousebrain

Fixed effects:

1) Time at which data sample was taken (on a linear scale in days -- so day two would be 2, day 5 would be 5, and so on)

2) The Age of the mouse in days (so there's definitely collinearity between this and the Time variable, but there are enough mice of different ages to make this worthwhile as a separate variable)

Random effect: Subject -- "Name" (ID number) of the mouse

Essentially, I'm wondering if it would be appropriate to run two LMEs. In the first, I'd treat Age and Subject as random variables in order to control for the effects of Age (and thus the collinearity between Age and Time) and see if Time is a significant predictor of the # of spikes (dependent variable). In the second, I'd enter Time and Subject as random variables to see if Age was a significant predictor.

library(lme4)
a = lmer(FiringRate ~ Time + (1|Age) + (1|Subject))
b = lmer(FiringRate ~ Age + (1|Time) + (1|Subject))
share|improve this question
It seems to me model b makes more sense, since you could imagine fixed developmental effects occurring at particular ages in all mice, but occasion specific conditions (captured by the random intercept, grouped by time) may be more thought of as random perturbations. – Macro Apr 6 '12 at 1:48
Thanks, I can see that... – Julie Apr 6 '12 at 3:05

Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook.

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.