Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Does the autocorrelation function have any meaning with a non-stationary time series?

The time series is generally assumed to be stationary before autocorrelation is used for Box and Jenkins modeling purposes.

share|improve this question
if your series is non stationnary, the ACF will decline very slowly, to the point of being useless (it essentially a constant). What do you mean by 'have any meaning' ? – user603 Sep 13 '10 at 17:02
If the time series is not stationary, often the 1st difference of the series will be stationary (for example, financial time series). – John Salvatier Dec 3 '10 at 22:18
up vote 11 down vote accepted

@whuber gave a nice answer. I would just add, that you can simulate this very easily in R:

op <- par(mfrow = c(2,2), mar = .5 + c(0,0,0,0))

N <- 500
# Simulate a Gaussian noise process
y1 <- rnorm(N)
# Turn it into integrated noise (a random walk)
y2 <- cumsum(y1)

plot(ts(y1), xlab="", ylab="", main="", axes=F); box()
plot(ts(y2), xlab="", ylab="", main="", axes=F); box()
acf(y1, xlab="", ylab="", main="", axes=F); box()
acf(y2, xlab="", ylab="", main="", axes=F); box()


Which ends up looking somewhat like this:

alt text

So you can easily see that the ACF function trails off slowly to zero in the case of a non-stationary series. The rate of decline is some measure of the trend, as @whuber mentioned, although this isn't the best tool to use for that kind of analysis.

share|improve this answer
+1 (Sorry about the belated vote): nice illustrations. – whuber Feb 24 '11 at 15:13

In its alternative form as a variogram, the rate at which the function grows with large lags is roughly the square of the average trend. This can sometimes be a useful way to decide whether you have adequately removed any trends.

You can think of the variogram as the squared correlation multiplied by an appropriate variance and flipped upside down.

(This result is a direct consequence of the analysis presented at Why does including latitude and longitude in a GAM account for spatial autocorrelation?, which shows how the variogram includes information about the expected squared difference between values at different locations.)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.