Tell me more ×
Cross Validated is a question and answer site for statisticians, data analysts, data miners and data visualization experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am a computer scientist performing research, which includes calculating the Spearman rank correlation of two lists, one ranked by a human, another by a computer program.

I have the following questions:

  1. I was reading this post and have become concerned with how large my sample size has to be to have a significant confidence level.
  2. Also if I have understand correctly the Fisher transform gives you a confidence level after you have gotten the Spearman rank correlation. If possible I would like to know the ideal sample size before I start the experimen
  3. On interpreting the value given to you by the Spearman rank correlation: I have read about the null hypothesis

    The general form of a null hypothesis for a Spearman correlation is: H0: There is no association between the two variables [in the population].

However what I want to prove is the opposite ie: that there is a very close association between the two variables. How is this done?

share|improve this question
Well, if you calculate a confidence interval for this coefficient and the value $0$ is not included, this indicate a possible association between the variables. I guess you would also reject H0 which would indicate evidence against "no association". – user10525 Apr 18 '12 at 13:27
I'm sorry, what does"the value $0$ is not included" mean please? Any by rejecting H0 I have shown there is some association but it would be helpful for me to know how "good" this association is. – ET13 Apr 18 '12 at 13:37
Spearman's rank correlation coefficient takes values in $[-1,1]$. $0$ means no correlation (in this sense, of course), positive values of this coefficient indicate positive association and similarly for negative values. Say you calculate a confidence interval for this coefficient and you get $I=(0.7,0.9)$. This suggests strong positive association between the variables and also $0$ is not included in the interval. – user10525 Apr 18 '12 at 13:41
The confidence interval tells me how reliable the correlation is (from wiki:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence_intervals). Am I correct in saying that it is the Spearman correlation which gives me the association and the correlation is just how likely this correlation is correct given the sample? – ET13 Apr 18 '12 at 13:57
A confidence interval (CI) actually tells you how reliable the 'estimation' is: "is used to indicate the reliability of an estimate". The interpretation of a 95% CI is "the probability that this interval contains the true value of the parameter is 95%". Spearman's coefficient is a measure of dependence (there are others) and it actually measures the correlation, see the definition. Therefore, a 95% CI can be used to assess the degree of association by analysing the values it contains. – user10525 Apr 18 '12 at 14:17
show 3 more comments

1 Answer

up vote 6 down vote accepted

If you are concerned about sample size and significance, good concepts to start out with include effect size and power (while on the topic of CIs, you might want to include accuracy as well)

As noted previously, 95% CI refers not to probability but to confidence; it is not the likelihood that the current CI contains the population parameter, but that out of 100 CIs 95 CIs will succeed in capturing the population parameter. The true probability remains unknown (unless you take a Bayesian approach), see Explorations in statistics: confidence intervals.

share|improve this answer
+1, this is a nice answer. Welcome to the site, I hope we'll see more like it in the future. – gung Apr 21 '12 at 14:45

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.