Tell me more ×
Cross Validated is a question and answer site for statisticians, data analysts, data miners and data visualization experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm looking for help in determining how to equate the following:

  1. We have a surface of 13 cm X 10 cm.
  2. We have a 95% probability of hit on a 16 cm diameter surface.

I would like to equate $B$, probability of hit to the 13cm X 10 cm surface. 95% probability of hit on a circle of 16 cm represent what probability of hit on the rectangle of 13cm X 10cm.

What is the mathematical steps to arrive to the solution? It is a job related problem not a school one.

share|improve this question
1  
What's a "hit"? Are you making an analogy to throwing darts at a dartboard? If so, you need additional information (or equivalent strong assumptions) to get an answer: you need to know the statistical distribution of "hits" around a target's center. – whuber May 1 '12 at 19:34
Hi Whuber, a better analogy would be to go to the firing range and shoot for fun. So 95% probability of hit represent 1.96 sigma S.D. And the bullet is able to fly and hit the paper target with a precision or dispersion that would put all of the bullet in a 45 mm diameter. But the shooter with this quality of gun/bullet system need to be able to hit the target 95% of the time. – Claude May 2 '12 at 16:12
OK. But precisely how is the 13 $\times$ 10 surface related to the target? At what point is the shooter aiming? And what distinction are you trying to make between darts and bullets: aren't they essentially the same physical analogy? – whuber May 2 '12 at 19:13
As for the darts or the bullets analogy it is ok... Yes they are the same but I thought that it would be clearer or more easy to explain. The Point of Aim is the centre of the target The 13*10 (130 cm^2) surface is the new target. In one case, I have a 95% probability of hit on a circular surface of 16 cm diametre (201 cm^2). How does this translate in probability of hitting the 130 cm^2 target? p.s. thanks for the help in any cases – Claude May 2 '12 at 20:16

1 Answer

If we assume the distribution of hits is binormal, then the distribution of the distance to the center of the target is a scaled Chi distribution with two degrees of freedom. From this (applying its inverse CDF), we find that its 95th percentile coincides with the radius of 16/2 = 8 centimeters when the scaling factor equals 1.33523. This factor is also the standard deviation of the components of the binormal distribution. Integrating the PDF of that binormal distribution over a 13 by 10 cm rectangle centered at the point of aim gives 0.83311, the desired value of $B$.

Here's a picture showing a shaded contour plot of the PDF restricted to that rectangle, with the circular target behind it for reference:

Target

The value of 0.83311 was found with Mathematica:

With[{s = 8 / InverseCDF[ChiDistribution[2], 0.95]}, 
 NIntegrate[PDF[BinormalDistribution[{0,0},{s,s},0],{x,y}], {x,-13/2,13/2}, {y,-10/2,10/2}]
]

It was checked by simulating 100,000 independent shots and reporting the proportions that (a) fell within the 16 cm circular target and (b) fell within the rectangular target:

With[{s = 8 / InverseCDF[g, 0.95], n = 100000}, 
 data = RandomReal[BinormalDistribution[{0, 0}, {s, s}, 0], n];
 old = Length[Select[data, Norm[#] <= 8 &]] / n;
 new = Length[Select[data, Abs[#[[1]]] <= 13/2 && Abs[#[[2]]] <= 10/2 &]] / n;
 {old, new} // N
]

The output of {0.94919, 0.83331} is close enough to the intended values of {0.95, 0.83311} to confirm the correctness of the calculations.

share|improve this answer
Whuber, Thank you very much for this. I cannot clainm to understand everthing. But I'll make special diligence to understand this. – Claude May 3 '12 at 18:20
WHuber, Together with a co-worker, we have understood your approach and solution... thanks – Claude May 3 '12 at 18:39

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.