Tell me more ×
Cross Validated is a question and answer site for statisticians, data analysts, data miners and data visualization experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 2 down vote favorite
1

I can't seem to find this anywhere on the internet or in my books. I'm putting together a construct for an underlying variable.

Is it acceptable to have a construct with two variables if that produces a bigger Cronbach alpha than the construct with 3 variables in a professional statistical analysis?

Using 2 variables seems a bit on the low side, but it produces better results.

share|improve this question
1  
If alpha is low when you have 3 items, that's an indication that your items don't go together that well. If it is much higher when you drop one item, that's an indication of which item was problematic. Some latent variables are hard to measure; but maybe you can come up with a third variable that works well. If you give us context, maybe someone here can help. – Peter Flom May 6 '12 at 11:16
The contruct originally consisted of these three variables. Apparently it doesn't measure what I want all that well. Can I still use it as a construct if it just has two variables? Is it common for a construct to only consist out of 2 variables? – J. Maes May 6 '12 at 12:23
1  
Are you saying that the research that supported a 3 item scale did not hold up when you replicated it? If so, why not. What Ns were involved in the two research studies? In any case, I would not discard a two item scale out of hand. Do you know if this two item scale correlates with any other variables of interest (i.e., construct validity or criterion-related validity)? – Joel W. May 6 '12 at 15:16
@JoelW. asks good questions. – Peter Flom May 6 '12 at 16:51

Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook.

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.