# Recommendation for peer-reviewed open-source journal?

I have a manuscript on a bootstrap method for testing hypotheses of one mean, and I would like to send it for publication, but I have a moral dilemma. I have signed on to the protest against Elsevier for their unethical business practices, and reading up on the whole issue really made me question the ethics of other for-profit academic journals. I would therefore like to publish in a journal which is non-profit, preferably open-source, even though I understand that such journals aren't yet considered on par with the more established journals as far as prestige is concerned. Fortunately, since I already have tenure, that's not a big consideration for me.

I would appreciate any recommendations.

-
Larry Wasserman suggests foregoing referees altogether! stat.cmu.edu/~larry/Peer-Review.pdf –  shabbychef May 9 '12 at 17:31
Welcome to the site, Anna. I have seen and appreciated your questions and answers on MO. I've even intended to answer/comment on one of your questions, but have not (yet) found the time. –  cardinal May 9 '12 at 17:45
I think publishers charge for online articles because there is an expense to publishing that they have a right to recoupe. Many journals give away abstracts and a select set of articles. But shifting from paper to electronic does not mean that they are no longer entitled to recoupe losses and earn a profit for their service which includes editorial expenses I think. –  Michael Chernick May 9 '12 at 19:01
I can't recommend anything, but wikiepdia has a huge list of relevant links over at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open_access_projects –  naught101 May 10 '12 at 1:14
@shabbychef: foregoing referees, yes, but Wasserman isn't really arguing for getting rid of peer-review generally, just opening it up. Also, he notes that such a solution isn't necessarily good for medicine, I would argue that it's also potentially a bad idea for controversial sciences like climate science (where there's a political incentive to write misleading papers). –  naught101 May 10 '12 at 1:22

A rather lengthy list can be found at the Directory of Open Access Journals. Using the search term statistics yielded a list of 80 open-source journals as of the time of this post.

I have had good experiences and success in the past with the IMS and Bernoulli society co-sponsored open-source journals, particularly

All IMS journals (e.g., AOS, AOAS, AOP, AOAP) now publish production-quality preprints on the arXiv statistics section, including all articles since 2004, as detailed on their website. Forthcoming articles are also available for free; see the Annals of Applied Statistics "Next Issues" page for an example.

Some other journals have gone to an online-access model recently, including, e.g., Sankhya.

-
Thanks, this is really helpful! –  Anna Varvak May 9 '12 at 19:57
@AnnaVarvak: I'm glad you found it useful and hope you to see you continue to participate on this site. Cheers. :) –  cardinal May 9 '12 at 22:22
@Rob: Thanks for catching that typo in the first link. I thought I had tested them all, but apparently not! –  cardinal May 10 '12 at 13:48
@cardinal A pleasure :) –  Rob May 10 '12 at 13:55
The IMS now says they posted all published articles on arXiv. Of course, this claim is difficult to verify. –  Faheem Mitha Nov 7 at 18:39
show 1 more comment

In case your method is somewhat implemented, Journal of Statistical Software is a pretty nice option -- they put emphasis on reproducibility and availability of methods and algorithms.

-
@AnnaVarvak: You are quite likely to already be aware of it, but the method you describe sounds roughly similar to some work within the last few years by various authors in the empirical-likelihood literature. There are a couple of approaches in which "artificial" data points are added to the sample in a strategic way in order to get better small-sample performance. There, if I recall, the inference is on a $p$-dimensional mean. But, on the surface, it seems reasonable to believe a similar approach might work for the bootstrap. –  cardinal May 9 '12 at 22:34