Tell me more ×
Cross Validated is a question and answer site for statisticians, data analysts, data miners and data visualization experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm doing some object recognition, and when I compare two images, I get some unbounded "distance" between the two images, representing how similar they are. This is somewhat useful, but it seems like it would be more useful if I could move from this "distance" space into a probability space, where instead of " The distance between image A and image B is X ", I could get " P(image is of class B | image A) = X' ".

What is a reasonable way to move from a distance space to a probability space?

share|improve this question

2 Answers

Distance immediately makes me think of multivariate Gaussian variables because the probability density is a function of the norm of the vector $(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n)$. But I guess in your case it seems that you want to associate a probability with a distance $d$ and not an $n$-tuple of coordinates.

I am afraid there is not a single solution. As @Emre points out, you only need a one-to-one mapping from $R^+$ to $(0,1)$, which will be your cmulative density function, but you won't know how well that mapping will discriminate your object/images.

Here are a couple of suggestions:

  1. The exponential distribution
  2. The symmetrized Gaussian
  3. The Gamma, log-Normal or Weibull distribution (the mode is away from 0, so this assumes that there is a typical distance between two random images).
share|improve this answer

If you want to merely constrain the output to a bounded range, use a continuous transformation like $d \to 1-\exp(-d)$, where $d$ is the distance.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.