Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The Wikipedia article on the Gamma distribution, lists two different parameterisation methods, one of them frequently used in Bayesian econometrics with $\alpha>0$ and $\beta>0$, $\alpha$ is shape parameter, $\beta$ is rate parameter.

$$X\sim \mathrm{Gamma}(\alpha,\beta).$$

In a Bayesian econometrics textbook written by Gary Koop, the precision paramether $\frac{1}{\sigma^2}=h$ follows a Gamma distribution, which is a prior distribution

$$h\sim \mathrm{Gamma}(\underline{s}^{-2},\underline{\nu}),$$

where $\underline{s}^{-2}$ is mean and $\underline{\nu}$ is degrees of freedom according to his Appendix. Also $s^2$ is standard error with definition


Thus for me, these two definition of the Gamma distribution are completely different, since the mean and variances will be different. If we follow the wikipedia definition, the mean will be $\alpha/\beta$, not $\underline{s}^{-2}$.

I am highly confused here, would anyone help me to streighten the thoughts here?

share|improve this question
I think you make a confusion: $s^2$ is the estimated standard deviation of the data, not the standard deviation of the Gamma distribution. And it should be the posterior, not the prior. – Stéphane Laurent Jun 18 '12 at 10:41
The Gamma, unfortunately, does not have a single standard parameterization. Sometimes a Gamma(a,b) has mean $ab$, sometimes mean $a/b$, and sometimes mean $a$ with shape parameter $b$. (This is not a comprehensive list.) They are all equivalent, for example, the $b$ in the second case equals the inverse of the $b$ in the first case. So you have to pay particular attention to how the density function is written to see which parameterization is being used. – jbowman Jun 18 '12 at 13:56

I think that the Wikipedia article is referring to a specific form of the gamma distribution known as $\chi^2$. Chi square is $\rm{Gamma}(\nu,1/2)$ and $s^2$ would be the constant that the $\chi^2$ random variable is multiplied by to get a random variable with the distribution of a variance estimate. That is $\alpha=\nu$ and $\beta=1/2$. It is s that is the standard error and not $s^2$. In the article you referred to the $\chi^2$ is listed under specials cases (second bullet).

share|improve this answer

It is customary to impose (as a prior) either the gamma distribution to $h=\frac{1}{\sigma^2}$ or the inverse gamma distribution to $\sigma^2$. Then, the posteior will have a beautiful looking. I believe you can assign a gamma distribution to $\sigma^2$, and still all calculation to derive the marginal by integrating out $\sigma^2$ will go through.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.