Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The Kappa ($\kappa$) test is a Z-test kind of test. If I am not very wrong, to compute the $\kappa$ test, we can just estimate the appropriate variance $\hat {var}(\hat\kappa)$ for the kappa statistic $\hat\kappa$ and then feed it to a z-test by taking $\mu$ = $\hat\kappa$ and $\sigma^2$ = $var(\hat\kappa)$.

To compute the power of a z-test one can use the relation $1 - \beta = \phi(Z_{a} - \sqrt n * (\mu-\mu_0)/\sigma)$

Would the power of this underlying z-test be also the power of the original $\kappa$ test? If not, why?

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The kappa statistic does not have a normal distribution. It is asymptotically normal which means that the normal gives a good approximation in large samples. In large samples the approximate power of the test can be based on the normal distribution. Note that the variance of kappa has a special form that should be used when estimating var(κˆ) just like using p^(1-p^)/n when using the normal approximation to the binomial. For kappa The asymptotic variance of the simple kappa coefficient is computed as

(A+B-C)/(1-Pe) $^2$) n


A=∑ pii (1-(pi.+p.i)(1-κ^)) $^2$


B=(1-κ^))$^2$ ∑∑ pij (p.i+pj.)$^2$


C=( κ^-Pe(1-κ^))$^2$ )

share|improve this answer
Thanks, this makes sense. I am glad to see the asymptotic variance you posted. It is the same I found in other stats books - and the one I am using. However, I am a little worried that the Kappa variance traditionally referred in the remote sensing literature is very different; would you by the way also know the reason for that? The remote sensing version is the one reported by Congalton, page 106: – Cesar Jun 23 '12 at 22:53
There are various forms of Kappa. i was referring to Cohen's. There is also one dur to Fliess. – Michael Chernick Jun 23 '12 at 23:03
Thanks. But that one is due to Cohen's as well... Still don't know why the difference. – Cesar Jun 23 '12 at 23:08

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.