Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose we have some house price data for 30 years (1970-1999). This is yearly data (30 data points). Suppose some major event $X$ happened on 1980. I want to see whether this event affected prices later on. Is using median filters a good methodology for detecting outliers in later years?

share|improve this question
@user603: Let $y_1 = \{1,2,3,4 \}$ and $y_2 = \{1,2,3,4,10,68 \}$. The median filter for the first would be $\{1,2,3,4 \}$ and the median filter for the second would be $\{1,2,3,4,10,68 \}$. – Damien Jul 24 '12 at 17:29
Meant subsitute i.e. substitute some genuine observations by some outliers and see the result. Also, the #of outliers< T/2-1 (T is the length of your series). – user603 Jul 24 '12 at 17:56
Damien, I don't think you're computing the filter correctly: you need to be more careful at the ends of the series. A median-of-three filter would give $(\*,2,3,\*)$ and $(\*,2,3,4,10,\*)$ in those cases, with "$\*$" representing a value that shouldn't be trusted. Notice that medians (of 3) give you no defense against pairs of adjacent outliers, either, but wider-window medians will be more stable. – whuber Jul 24 '12 at 18:04
@Damien Sounds like you could do an intervention analysis. One option would be to use a standard regression model with a binary indicator variable as an independent variable (switched "on" for the period in which the event occurred) and ARIMA errors. Very similar to the ARIMAX / transfer function models mentioned by others, but easier to interpret in terms of effects of the input onto the output. Rob Hyndman has a blogpost on this here. – Graeme Walsh Oct 19 '13 at 0:37
You need to do this in the context of the house price process. – Aksakal Sep 10 '14 at 16:41

I like the idea of looking for interventions that form level changes in a process. This can be done using ARIMA models and search for the changepoints. Our friend IrishStat does this with his autobox software as he so nicely demonstated yesterday.

I am sure he will be happy to give you more details and perhaps even do a data analysis for you.

I wouldn't call the level shifts outliers. There are various types of outliers in time series and numerous ways to try to detect them. We also discussed this either yesterday or today. Fox identified two type of outliers in his paper from back in the 70s.

share|improve this answer
There is also a changepoint package in R. – Damien Jul 24 '12 at 19:09
@Damien There is a changepoint package in R. It is important for you to know all the caveats i.e.all the assumptions underlying the tests that are conducted. The BIG PRINT giveth and the small print taketh away. You will find a lot of small print. – IrishStat Jul 24 '12 at 22:17
Totally agree. Fortunately, in time series, it's easy to set up an evaluation mechanism. That's the advice i was trying to convey above. Try several approaches whilst keeping a percentage of your observations tucked away. Then use the different models you have to forecast those observations you kept away. Evaluate the quality of the different models by how good they forecasted the data they didn't see. It's often an illuminating exercise. – user603 Jul 24 '12 at 22:29
@user603 thanks for your insightful comment. – Michael Chernick Jul 24 '12 at 22:36
@user603 The problem I see in your suggestion , although "reasonable" is that it is a "single origin' conclusion/test. Time series models/forecasts can often be "incorrect" from a single origin. One needs to evaluate models/forecasts from many origins so I would suggest that this be done from each and every point in the set of "tucked away" values. Recall that a single swallow does not make a summer ! – IrishStat Jul 24 '12 at 22:58

If you know a priori that a major event occurred at a specific point in time, then one could use a piece of software (that I won't mention because I blush easily!) and specify that this "cause variable" can have contemporaneous and lag structures, THEN a PDL or ADL can be identified to quantify the contemporaneous and lagged structure. This is known as a Transfer Function Model or as an ARMAX model. If you don't have access to this kind of (not-so-expensive) software, then simply lag the indicator/event variable as many times as you think appropriate and estimate the ARMAX model, which of course would include your ARIMA specification and any other indicators reflecting the impact of pulses, level shifts, seasonal pulses and local time trends that were necessary to yield a Gaussian error structure, a.k.a. white noise.

share|improve this answer
I think the DSE package estimates ARMAX models in R. – Damien Jul 27 '12 at 22:38

The general answer is No, especially, in econometrics. At the very least, you have to use a bunch of control variables: many things impact home prices. Also, you have to be aware of endogeneity: maybe this event was caused by other things, which also had impact on house prices. Establishing causal relationship in econometrics is very tricky.

You may want to look at regression discontinuity literature.

One last point: there's a ton of literature on house prices. You better have a good survey before starting your study.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.