Tell me more ×
Cross Validated is a question and answer site for statisticians, data analysts, data miners and data visualization experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have two treatments (rodent poisoning quadrats ($n=5$) and non poisoning quadrats ($n=5$)) and for each treatment I survey the number of individually identified invertebrates appearing across time after $6$, $15$, $30$ and $42$ months. My set of data is a number of cumulated new invertebrates appearing for the two treatments across time.I organized the data as a cumulated number of new invertebrates (invertebrates found and identified at T are not take into account at T+1 )between searches.

How can I compare the treatment effects to assess if in rodent poisoning quadrats the number of invertebrates is significantly higher than in non poisoning quadrats (this is the goal to be attained)?Is there a way to know if the rate apparition of new invertebrates is different between treatments?

EDIT: I did a cumulated number of new invertebrates (invertebrates found and identified at T are not take into account at T+1) between searches. Is there a way to know if the rate apparition of new invertebrates is different between treatments?

share|improve this question
I did a little editing here, but I don't fully understand what you are saying: "My set of data is a number of accumulated new invertebrates appearing for the two treatments across time", do you mean that your response variable is the total count of new invertebrates that have occurred between the last measurement & the next? – gung Aug 18 '12 at 3:22
@KMC If you want to improve your question, use edit and reserve answering for actual answers. – mbq Aug 18 '12 at 14:34

Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook.

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.