Tell me more ×
Cross Validated is a question and answer site for statisticians, data analysts, data miners and data visualization experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The following is a Bayesian model, there are variables $Y_1,Y_2 \in \{ 0,1 \}$ and variable $X \in \{ 0, 1\}$ and $\theta$ between $0$ and $1$.

The model is:

  1. draw $\theta$ from Beta distribution with parameters $a$ and $b$
  2. draw $Y_1$ from Bernoulli $\theta$
  3. draw $Y_2$ from Bernoulli $\theta$
  4. draw $X$ as following: with prob. $\theta$, $X = Y_1\,\, XOR\,\, Y_2$ and with probability $1-\theta$ $X = 1 - (Y_1\,\, XOR\,\, Y_2)$.

The joint distribution is:

$$p(\theta,Y_1,Y_2,X) = p(\theta |a,b)p(Y_1 | \theta)p(Y_2 | \theta)p(X | Y_1,Y_2,\theta)$$

I calculated the joint $p(X,Y_1,Y_2,\theta)$. The interesting part which I don't have an intuitive explanation for is why $$p(Y_1 = 0 | Y_2 = 0, X = 0) = P(Y_1 = 1 | Y_2 = 0, X = 0) = 1/2$$

which is what I get from my calcs. It seems counter-intuitive, because I would expect $a$ and $b$ to bias this posterior. The probabilities do not equal each 1/2, for example, if we compare $$p(Y_1 = 0 | Y_2 = 0, X = 1)$$ and $$p(Y_1 = 1 | Y_2 = 0, X= 1)$$.

Does anyone have an intuitive explanation why the above probabilities, each equals 1/2?

share|improve this question
What does XOR Y$_2$ mean? – Michael Chernick Aug 18 '12 at 18:50
@MichaelChernick This usually means Exclusive or. – user10525 Aug 18 '12 at 18:56
SO Y$_1$ XOR Y$_2$ means either Y$_1$ or Y$_2$ but not both. – Michael Chernick Aug 18 '12 at 18:59
@MichaelChernick - yes, that's correct. – jbowman Aug 18 '12 at 19:01
@singelton Do you mean Y$_1$ drawn from Bernoulli θ$_1$ and Y$_2$ Bernoulli θ$_2$ or something else? You can't mean Bernoulli θ. – Michael Chernick Aug 18 '12 at 19:09
show 4 more comments

1 Answer

The beta distribution is not important. Arbitrarily choose $\theta_1 \in (0,1).$

Let $Y_i$ be IID $\text{Bernoulli}(\theta_1)$ for $i=1,2,3$.

Let $X$ be the indicator of the event that even number of the $Y_i$ are $1.$ So, with probability $\theta_1$, $Y_3 = 1$ and then $X = Y_1 ~\text{xor}~ Y_2$. With probability $1-\theta_1,$ $Y_3 = 0$ and then $X = \text{not}(Y_1 ~\text{xor}~ Y_2).$

Given that an odd number of the $Y_i$ are $1$, and $Y_2 = 0$, then either $Y_1 = 0$ and $Y_3 = 1$, or else $Y_1=1$ and $Y_3=0$, and the conditional probabilities of these are equal by symmetry hence $1/2$.

share|improve this answer
The model is not well-defined by the OP. Douglas' example is equivalently stated as follows: the r.v. $Y_1$, $Y_2$, $Y_3$ are conditionally independent given $\theta_1$ and $X=Y_1 ~\text{xor}~Y_2$ or $X=~\text{not}(Y_1 ~\text{xor}~ Y_2)$ according to whether $Y_3=1$ ou $0$. But the OP does not precise how $X$ is drawing at random (for instance the above construction with $Y_3$ replaced with $Y_2$ satisfies OP's assumptions). In Douglas' situation we can also check that $\Pr(Y_1=0\mid Y_2=0, X=0, \theta_1)=\Pr(Y_1=1\mid Y_2=0, X=0, \theta_1)=\theta_1\theta_2\theta_2$ and the result follows. – Stéphane Laurent Aug 18 '12 at 23:22
Stephane, are my changes helpful? – singelton Aug 18 '12 at 23:32
@singelton Yes, but in view of coherence with the answer it would be better to denote $\theta_1$ instead of $\theta$. – Stéphane Laurent Aug 19 '12 at 8:36
In my first comment above there is something wrong. Replacing $\theta_1\theta_2\theta_2$ with $\theta_1\theta_2\theta_2/\Pr(Y_2=0,X=0)$ should be correct. – Stéphane Laurent Aug 19 '12 at 8:38

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.