That statement seems to be inaccurate or misleading.
When you have a limit, you don't automatically know that you are actually close for any particular fixed $n$. An additional result like that is called effective. One effective version of the Central Limit Theorem is the Berry-Esseen theorem, which bounds the difference between the CDF of $S_n$ and $\Phi$ in terms of the third central moment of $X$ and the standard deviation of $X$. To use this, you need the third central moment to exist, and you need a bound on it. The Central Limit Theorem does not require the third central moment to exist, though, so this does not work every time the Central Limit Theorem applies.
In addition, since you don't have a uniform bound on the third central moments even when they exist, you can't say that $S_n$ resembles a normal distribution well. More precisely, if you choose $n$, I can pick a distribution for $X$ so that $S_n$ is far from normal, so that the convergence happens later. Let $X$ be $0$ with high probability ($\frac{n^2-1}{n^2}$), with equal small ($\frac{1}{2n^2}$) chances to be $n$ and $-n.$ This has mean $0$ and variance $1$, but the probability is over $\frac{n-1}{n}$ that $S_n = 0$.