Tell me more ×
Cross Validated is a question and answer site for statisticians, data analysts, data miners and data visualization experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What are the steps to obtain the following result:

Given that X have $\Gamma(1,s)$ distribution; and that X=x, and Y have the Poisson distribution with parameter x. Then the characteristic function of Y is: $\phi_Y(t) = E[E[e^{itY}|X]] = E[exp(X(e^{it} -1))]=(2-e^{it})^{-s}$?

I can't see how to use the definition of the characteristic function of each distribution to obtain the final result.

share|improve this question

1 Answer

If $X\sim \textrm{Gamma}(s,1)\newcommand{\E}{\mathbb{E}}$, then its moment generating function is $$M_X(t)=\E\left[e^{tX}\right]=(1-t)^{-s} \, , $$ for $t\in\mathbb{R}$.

If $Y\mid X=x\sim \mathrm{Poisson}(x)$, then $$\E\left[ e^{itY} \mid X=x \right]=\exp\left(x(e^{it}-1)\right) \, .$$

Hence, the random variable $\E\left[ e^{itY} \mid X \right]=\exp\left(X(e^{it}-1)\right)$ (a.s.).

Define $u=e^{it}-1$, and use the tower property to get

$$\phi_Y(t)=\E\left[e^{itY}\right]=\E\left[\E\left[e^{itY}\mid X\right]\right]=\E\left[\exp\left(X(e^{it}-1)\right)\right]$$

$$=\E\left[e^{uX}\right]=M_X(u) = (1-u)^{-s} = (2-e^{it})^{-s} \, ,$$ which is actually cheating, because $u$ is not a real number, but you can find a formal justification for the last steps of this computation.

P.S. If you're confused about the meaning of $\E\left[e^{itY}\mid X\right]$, take a look at this.

share|improve this answer
Nice, and thanks for the link. – citrucel Oct 14 '12 at 20:27

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.