Assume a linear regression with metric predictors: y ~ x1 + x2 + x3
Assume all x are significant predictors.
Now I want to find out if predictors differ from each other, that is, if one predictor is a stronger predictor of y than the others, and on top of it, if it is significantly stronger.
Results:
X | Unstd. B | Std. Beta | t value | p value | CI lower | CI upper
1--- .140----- .170 ------ 9.806 --- .000 --- .112 --- .168 ------
2--- .022----- .035 ------ 2.252 --- .024 --- .003 --- .041 ------
3--- .256----- .152 ------ 9.898 --- .000 --- .210 --- .302 ------
Row 1 = x1, row 2 = x2, row 3 = x3. From the p values x2 is the weakest predictor, and also has the lowest std beta weight. But is it significantly weaker than the other predictors? Which of the other two is stronger?
EDIT:
So that we can understand this question, please tell us what it means for predictors to be "strong" or "weak."
I am predicting impairment/disability by different symptoms of a disorder, and want to find out whether one symptom is associated with more impairment than the other symptoms, that is, whether it explains more variance of impairment than the others, although all symptoms are significant predictors. It's about the degree of prediction, not about significance.
caretpackage: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/caret/vignettes/caretVarImp.pdf Conversely, I would not put too much stock in statistical significance, which measures something different than importance (however that concept may be defined). – Stephan Kolassa Nov 24 '12 at 19:42