Tell me more ×
Cross Validated is a question and answer site for statisticians, data analysts, data miners and data visualization experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I was reading Hogg/Craig and my course notes and encountered a subsection on simulation to find out Confidence Intervals. The method expressed is to generate a random sample, calculate the MLE, repeat a billion times, find upper and lower $\alpha/2$ quantiles for the empirical distribution of the MLE. (Call them $l$ and $u$.)

Then, it said that a crude CI for the MLE would be $\hat{\theta}\pm z_{\alpha/2} SE(\hat{\theta})$. I understood everything till her. Now, they said, that a better estimate would be :

$$\hat{\theta} \in (2\hat{\theta}-u,2\hat{\theta}-l)$$ and added that this is called "reflecting quantiles". I don't appreciate

  • Why this is a CI in the first place?
  • How is this better?
  • What is the rationale behind this?
share|improve this question

Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook.

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.