Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm currently applying to graduate school for a career that will be greatly enhanced if I have a firm grasp of what constitutes an excellent, good, mediocre, bad, etc. experiment and results. The vast majority of the material I expect to analyze will be medical journal articles.

While I have taken the requisite courses to evaluate the articles (stats, ethics, probability, experimental design, etc.) I haven't had such a course in several years. I am curious if anyone knows of a thorough book; a sort of quick-reference guide that will help me sort out the chaff when a clear interpretation isn't possible (i.e. - studies with only a few dozen participants, studies that are not blind, studies where the results seem well interpreted but the design itself is questionable).

It doesn't need to be "How to Interpret p-Values 101", but something that would hopefully prevent me running to my old notes every time I forget what chi-squared represents in the context of an experiment.

share|improve this question

migrated from Dec 12 '12 at 15:33

This question came from our site for academics and those enrolled in higher education.

From your last paragraph, it sounds like you want a stats cheat-sheet - a very concise summary of the sort of tests you might find in medical papers. Is that right? – EnergyNumbers Dec 12 '12 at 9:01
Probability & Statistics For Engineers & Scientists, 8/E, by Wapole, Publisher: Pearson Education would be a good place to start. Its what we(undergraduates) were asked to use in our introductory class on Probability and statistics. – Naresh Dec 12 '12 at 9:16
@EnergyNumbers - That's about right. I'd prefer something a little heftier that addressed some of the murkier aspects of experimental design as well, but I can usually spot questionable design better than questionable conclusions. – MCM Dec 12 '12 at 13:16
Very closely related:… – whuber Dec 12 '12 at 16:26

Statistics Explained by Hinton (ISBN: 0415332850) is a pretty good reference for something like this.

There's also a little bit meatier of a book "Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences" by Gravetter (ISBN: 0495602205) which I thought was easy to follow and refer to but you may find less useful because it's phrased more for psychology types of students.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.