Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

My regression results are as follows.

Variable    B          exp(B)
age        0.004575    1.004586
capital    0.2250      1.2524
year      -0.1026      0.9024

Can someone please help me to interpret these? (eg: one year increase in age would increase/decrease the hazard by Xx%)

share|improve this question

For two covariates ($x_1$ and $x_2$), the Cox model is written as (with standard notations) $$ h(t; x_1, x_2) = h_0(t) \exp(x_1 \beta_1 + x_2 \beta_2). $$ To interpret $\beta_1$, note that $$ \frac{h(t; x_1 + 1, x_2)}{h(t; x_1, x_2)} = \exp(\beta_1). $$ In words, the previous equation tells us that whenever $x_1$ increases by 1 unit ($x_2$ being held fixed), the hazard rate is multiplied by $\exp(\beta_1)$.

On the log-scale, we have $$ \log(h(t; x_1 + 1, x_2)) - \log(h(t; x_1, x_2)) = \beta_1. $$

share|improve this answer

For every unit increase in year, the hazard decreased by 9.8% assuming the other variables are held constant.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.