Tell me more ×
Cross Validated is a question and answer site for statisticians, data analysts, data miners and data visualization experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm working on a meta-analysis and have generated a quirky question for which I'm at a bit of a loss. The MA is for a large set of factorial experiments. Calculating the Log Response Ratio (LRR) and variance in said ratio for the experimental data is a cinch, and we're comparing the effects of one type of treatment to the other (and any interactions).

However, my group is curious at examining the effect of HALF the level of one of the treatments (it's a continuous treatment, and we've been looking at the highest versus the lowest level of the treatment). We have fit nonlinear curves for each experiment that describe how the treatment effects the response over a wide range of treatment levels. We've got the coefficient error and residual error for each of these curve fits. And how we want to calculate log(full treatment) - log(half treatment) from the fitted curve for the this half-treatment log response ratio. Easy.

But...how would we then calculate the variance in the half-treatment log response ratio? Would we use the SE estimates for the curve coefficients? The residual error? What would the sample size be for the variance calculation? Or is this unimportant? Thoughts?

share|improve this question
In fitting the nonlinear curves have you modelled the unstransformed response or the log of the response, or something else? – onestop Nov 23 '10 at 20:27

1 Answer

up vote 0 down vote accepted

And the answer after external consultation seems to be a bootstrapped estimate of the variance with a sample size for later weighting that is the same as the sample size used to estimate the curve in the first place.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.