Tell me more ×
Cross Validated is a question and answer site for statisticians, data analysts, data miners and data visualization experts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

My data consists of individual level observations nested within countries over time. I would like to use multilevel models along with some sort of selection model.

I have three related questions.

1) Are there any issues or concerns with using a Heckman selection model twice?

I have a model with two selection stages. While I can't conceive of any reason why this shouldn't work, I also haven't seen any examples of a heckman selection model being used twice. Assume I also have the necessary exclusion restrictions.

2) My primary tool is R. There exists a package, sampleSelection, but my understanding is that algorithm it uses may not be appropriate for panel data / multilevel models.

In stata, my understanding is the aforementioned is possible, but I'm not sure a package in R exists for doing heckman selection with multilevel models.

3) Are there better ways for accomplishing what I am trying to do? Perhaps using instruments alone would be better? If so, are there any R packages you could point me to? If there are no R packages, I am still interested in this answer since I would be happy to code something if necessary.

Thank you.

share|improve this question

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Looking at the Heckman article I see no reason, why two selection rules cannot be applied. In the article Heckman postulates the model as:

$Y_{1i}=X_{1i}\beta_1+U_{1i}$ $Y_{2i}=X_{2i}\beta_1+U_{2i}$

The goal is to estimate the first equation, but some data is missing. Which data is missing is controled by second equation. Then we have

$E(Y_{1i}| X_{1i}, \text{sample selection rule})=X_{1i}\beta_1+E(U_{1i}|\text{sample selection rule})$

If sample selection rule is $Y_{2i}\ge 0$ we have

$E(Y_{1i}|X_{1i},Y_{2i}\ge 0)=X_{1i}\beta_1+E(U_{1i}|U_{2i}\ge -X_{2i}\beta_2)$

And the article goes into details how this is estimated. From this I see no reason why we cannot add another sample selection rule $Y_{3i}\ge 0$, where:

$Y_{3i}=X_{3i}\beta_3+U_{3i}$

Then we get

$E(Y_{1i}|X_{1i},Y_{2i}\ge 0,Y_{3i}\ge 0)=X_{1i}\beta_1+E(U_{1i}|U_{2i}\ge -X_{2i}\beta_2,U_{3i}\ge X_{3i}\beta_3)$

Everything depends what assumptions are laid on $U_{1i},U_{2i},U_{3i}$. For estimation we can form maximum likelihood, or look for analog of formulas with Mills ration for bivariate normal density for trivariate normal density. In the latter case proceed as in article. I would be quite optimistic of this idea succeeding.

For the panel data framework look at Wooldridge book "Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data". It has whole chapter dedicated for sample selection problems for panel data. The way I see it, it is straightforward application of ideas in Heckman's article.

As for the code in R, tough luck. If it is not implemented in plm package, it probably does not have readily available implementation.

share|improve this answer
Thank you! Just to add, I found in the sampleSelection R package, under the help page of the inverse mills function, the ability to extract inverse mill ratios for bivariate probit models which can then be used in the final outcome equation. This doesn't resolve the panel data issue, but it does address the multiple selection one. FWIW. – Robert Dec 8 '10 at 22:35

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.