# Probability Interpretations [closed]

How comprehensive is the following book - What interpretations are missing?

Interpretations of Probability, Andrei Khrennikov, 2009, de Gruyter, ISBN 978-3-11-020748-4

http://www.degruyter.com/cont/fb/ma/detailEn.cfm?isbn=9783110207484&sel=pi

Contents:http://www.degruyter.com/files/pdf/9783110207484Contents.pdf

-
I don't think it is a valid question here; just check out wiki and references there: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_interpretations – mbq Jul 28 '10 at 18:20
That wikipedia article is filled with "dubious-discuss" and other tags, so the question would become how comprehensive is that wiki article, what interpretations are missing from it. – Roy Maclean Jul 28 '10 at 18:26
Still references are quite informative. And nevertheless even if it is discussive and mentions something that is not present in the book it is some kind of a clue, isn't it? – mbq Jul 28 '10 at 18:45
See the meta thread: meta.stats.stackexchange.com/questions/213/… where this question is proposed to be closed. – user28 Jul 29 '10 at 13:25

## closed as not a real question by mbq♦, Srikant Vadali, csgillespie, Peter Smit, Rob HyndmanJul 29 '10 at 23:43

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, see the FAQ.