Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

a journal article has a method for designing experiments to be fit to a 4-parameter logistic model. The model used is $y= D + \frac{A - D}{1 + (\frac{x}{C}) ^ B}$
A = upper asymptote
B = maximum slope
C = x value when y = 50% of maximum (i.e. 1/2 of upper asymptote)
D = lower asymptote
Using pilot data, further experiments are optimally designed by plugging the preliminary parameter estimates into equations presented in the article.

However, the nonlinear modeling software that I have access to parameterizes the 4-parameter logistic model differently. The model used is $y = D + \frac{A - D}{1 + e^{B(x-C)}}$

Once I estimate the parameters from the software, how do I translate these to the exponential parameterization used by the software? Thank you.

share|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

These models are not the same, because the first is a rational function of $x$ and the second is an exponential function. The second one is truly a "logistic" model but the first is not. Moreover, the claims about $B$ and $C$ in the first model are not true. The maximum slope depends on $C$, which is a scale parameter, not a location parameter. Moreover, although the maximum slope does depend on $B$, it does so in a complicated fashion. For instance, when $B = 2$, the maximum slope equals $\frac{9}{8\sqrt{3}}$.

If you write $x = \log(z)$ and $C = \log(\gamma)$ then the second model is

$$y = D + \frac{A-D}{1 + \exp(B(\log(z)-\log(\gamma))} = D + \frac{A-D}{1 + (z/\gamma)^B},$$

which does have the form of the first model. In other words, in the first model the logarithm of $z$ has a logistic form.

share|improve this answer
Thank you for that explanation. So what I gather is that when the software returns the pilot parameters, they can be plugged directly into the journal formulas, except for C. The software returns gamma = exp(C). To translate into the journal article's equation, take log(gamma) to get C. ** You've helped a lot, thanks again ** – Paul Apr 7 '11 at 15:06

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.