Take the 2-minute tour ×
Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I would also be interested to know why it is one or the other.

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

A p-value is a random variable, so it's not a population parameter.

You could certainly argue that it's a statistic:

A statistic (singular) is a single measure of some attribute of a sample (e.g., its arithmetic mean value). It is calculated by applying a function (statistical algorithm) to the values of the items of the sample, which are known together as a set of data.

share|improve this answer
    
Could you argue that it isn't? –  Scortchi Apr 25 at 15:43
    
@Scortchi Someone might argue that it isn't usually thought of in those terms. I'd say that I wouldn't think of it as an estimator*, but that it is a sample statistic. *(at least not one I'd care to use for anything in general; in particular instances perhaps) –  Glen_b Apr 25 at 23:04

A $p$-value is the probability of observing a test static value as or more extreme than the test statistic created from one's data if the null hypothesis is true. You can therefore interpret the $p$-value as a measure of how extreme your test statistic is under H$_{0}$ and the probability distribution attached to H$_{0}$. The $p$-value is therefore a statistic that is a function of one's data, and one's choice of H$_{0}$.

share|improve this answer

If the test statistic can be called a statistic, then so must the $p$-value: the test statistic is a function of the data under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. The $p$-value is simply a probability associated with that test statistic.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.