12,696 reputation
3752
bio website
location Australia
age 29
visits member for 4 years, 3 months
seen 7 hours ago

Statistics tragic, most definitely an objective Bayesian style statistician. I find myself quite compelled by the "probability as extended logic" philosophy, particularly the work of Edwin Jaynes. I have also derived on of the most important rules ever: BAYESIAN+JAYNES=JAYNESIAN. lol. But seriously, I am in awe of this guy: he is like the "Jesus" of statistical thinking.

I also quite dislike the use of the word "prior beliefs" which gets attach to prior probabilities in the Bayesian world. It brings over the wrong connotations - I think "prior assumptions" or "prior state of knowledge" better describes what is actually encapsulated by "the prior" of Bayesian statistics.

Which is worse: a frequentist who refuses to use prior's (but is happy to assume a likelihood) or a subjective Bayesian who claims that they can be whatever you "believe"?


188
× 43
70
× 23
187
× 56
68
× 27
77
× 30
64
× 17
77
× 16
60
× 21
72
× 13
55
× 8
Cross Validated 12,696 rep 3752
Mathematics 385 rep 412
Stack Overflow 108 rep 4

914 Votes Cast

all time   by type   month  
907 up 490 question 6
7 down 424 answer