11,308 reputation
2840
bio website
location Australia
age 28
visits member for 3 years, 4 months
seen 16 hours ago

Statistics tragic, most definitely an objective Bayesian style statistician. I find myself quite compelled by the "probability as extended logic" philosophy, particularly the work of Edwin Jaynes. I have also derived on of the most important rules ever: BAYESIAN+JAYNES=JAYNESIAN. lol. But seriously, I am in awe of this guy: he is like the "Jesus" of statistical thinking.

I also quite dislike the use of the word "prior beliefs" which gets attach to prior probabilities in the Bayesian world. It brings over the wrong connotations - I think "prior assumptions" or "prior state of knowledge" better describes what is actually encapsulated by "the prior" of Bayesian statistics.

Which is worse: a frequentist who refuses to use prior's (but is happy to assume a likelihood) or a subjective Bayesian who claims that they can be whatever you "believe"?


168
× 43
62
× 22
164
× 53
59
× 16
73
× 16
58
× 25
66
× 30
58
× 20
63
× 13
48
× 17
Cross Validated 11,308 rep 2840
Mathematics 355 rep 110
Stack Overflow 101 rep 1

831 Votes Cast

all time   by type   month  
824 up 430 question 18
7 down 401 answer