12,178 reputation
3549
bio website
location Australia
age 29
visits member for 4 years
seen 12 hours ago

Statistics tragic, most definitely an objective Bayesian style statistician. I find myself quite compelled by the "probability as extended logic" philosophy, particularly the work of Edwin Jaynes. I have also derived on of the most important rules ever: BAYESIAN+JAYNES=JAYNESIAN. lol. But seriously, I am in awe of this guy: he is like the "Jesus" of statistical thinking.

I also quite dislike the use of the word "prior beliefs" which gets attach to prior probabilities in the Bayesian world. It brings over the wrong connotations - I think "prior assumptions" or "prior state of knowledge" better describes what is actually encapsulated by "the prior" of Bayesian statistics.

Which is worse: a frequentist who refuses to use prior's (but is happy to assume a likelihood) or a subjective Bayesian who claims that they can be whatever you "believe"?


184
× 43
67
× 23
174
× 54
63
× 17
74
× 30
62
× 25
74
× 16
60
× 21
68
× 13
51
× 15
Cross Validated 12,178 rep 3549
Mathematics 375 rep 212
Stack Overflow 108 rep 4

905 Votes Cast

all time   by type   month  
898 up 482 question 1
7 down 423 answer