11,820 reputation
3344
bio website
location Australia
age 28
visits member for 3 years, 8 months
seen yesterday

Statistics tragic, most definitely an objective Bayesian style statistician. I find myself quite compelled by the "probability as extended logic" philosophy, particularly the work of Edwin Jaynes. I have also derived on of the most important rules ever: BAYESIAN+JAYNES=JAYNESIAN. lol. But seriously, I am in awe of this guy: he is like the "Jesus" of statistical thinking.

I also quite dislike the use of the word "prior beliefs" which gets attach to prior probabilities in the Bayesian world. It brings over the wrong connotations - I think "prior assumptions" or "prior state of knowledge" better describes what is actually encapsulated by "the prior" of Bayesian statistics.

Which is worse: a frequentist who refuses to use prior's (but is happy to assume a likelihood) or a subjective Bayesian who claims that they can be whatever you "believe"?


177
× 43
65
× 23
167
× 54
63
× 17
73
× 16
60
× 21
72
× 30
59
× 25
67
× 13
49
× 17
Cross Validated 11,820 rep 3344
Mathematics 370 rep 110
Stack Overflow 101 rep 1

889 Votes Cast

all time   by type  
882 up 470 question
7 down 419 answer