| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 6 months |
| seen | Oct 2 '12 at 18:28 | |
| stats | profile views | 28 |
|
Feb 13 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Oct 2 |
comment |
Power analysis for binomial data when the null hypothesis is that $p = 0$ According to pwr.p.test, for a power of 0.5, you need at least 677 observations. But power = 0.5 is very low! |
|
Oct 2 |
answered | Power analysis for binomial data when the null hypothesis is that $p = 0$ |
|
Sep 25 |
answered | How to determine which variables are statistically significant in multiple regression? |
|
Sep 25 |
asked | Power analysis with weighted survey data |
|
Sep 25 |
comment |
Conducting a power analysis on difference between two proportions In the pwr package, also pwr.2p.test and pwr.2p2n.test. |
|
Jun 11 |
answered | Practical significance, especially with percents: “standard” measure and threshold |
|
Jun 9 |
comment |
Practical significance, especially with percents: “standard” measure and threshold In the context of $y = a+bx$, I think a good measure of practical significance is $Q = b\sigma_x/\sigma_y$ (is there a name for this?). It measures the change (in SD's) in $y$ for a 1 SD change in $x$. Thus, you could say something like: Q < 1/3: very low effect; Q < 1/2: low effect; Q 1/2 to 2: medium effect; Q > 2: high effect; Q > 3: very high effect. In your example, all I need to know is that $b = 0.0000001$ and the SD's of $y$ and $x$. |
|
Jun 9 |
revised |
Practical significance, especially with percents: “standard” measure and threshold fixed typo |
|
Jun 9 |
asked | Practical significance, especially with percents: “standard” measure and threshold |
|
May 8 |
comment |
Mixture model fixed effects Thank you everyone who has read my question and tried to answer. All of the answers gave me good ideas / starting points. Unfortunately, no answer gave a straightforward solution. I will therefore let StackExchange automatically assign the bounty based on the votes cast by the community. |
|
May 8 |
comment |
Mixture model fixed effects Some good ideas. Thank you. |
|
May 1 |
comment |
Summarizing five-point Likert scale This is probably too much for the original poster, but others might find this interesting: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_consensus_theory |
|
Apr 30 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Apr 30 |
comment |
Mixture model fixed effects Thanks! Done... |
|
Apr 30 |
revised |
Mixture model fixed effects retag |
|
Apr 30 |
awarded | Promoter |
|
Apr 30 |
revised |
Mixture model fixed effects Clarifications |
|
Apr 27 |
comment |
Mixture model fixed effects @Aniko- Thank you! Any suggestion as to which package does this? (An R package, a MATLAB function, something else?) |
|
Apr 27 |
answered | Expected value for discrete (nominal) variable? |