57,097 reputation
388190
bio website quantdec.com
location Northeastern US
age 13
visits member for 2 years, 9 months
seen 4 hours ago
stats profile views 11,244

Consultant (environmental and spatial stats a specialty), expert witness, and teacher.


May
7
comment How should I fit a curve to my data
This question is based on a misconception: consistency of an MLE does not imply this curve will even remotely approximate a power.
May
7
comment Confusion regarding weighted average
You have stated that you want to weight your data without mentioning why, so there's no basis here to formulate an objective answer to your question. (The only question in evidence is "For each name, I'm trying to find the return rate," whose answer does not involve any weighting.) Please tell us explicitly what you want to achieve.
May
7
comment How to perform regression analysis? (Including assumptions)
For more information, search our site: there are hundreds of answers addressing variations of this question.
May
7
comment Testing hypothesis
We do invite homework questions, but--as explained in our faq--we expect such questions to show partial work towards a solution and to make a focused inquiry concerning the point where you are stuck. "Have no idea" is not specific enough. If you edit this question following those guidelines we will be glad to keep it open.
May
7
comment Hypothesis testing for normal distribution
We do invite homework questions, but--as explained in our faq--we expect such questions to show partial work towards a solution and to make a focused inquiry concerning the point where you are stuck. To allow this question to remain open, please edit it accordingly.
May
7
comment Show that $G(x)$ is a distribution function and find mean
Nevertheless, assuming $F(0)=0$, $G$ is a valid CDF for all values of $x$, so I think your accusations of inconsistency are a little overblown. There's a simple typographical error in the problem statement, that's all.
May
7
comment Comparing correlations between two groups
I'm sorry, it doesn't help me: could you be more specific about what a "different" correlation would be? Let's take a very simple example of two different-sized groups: a group of three and a group of two. For the group of three there are three correlation coefficients and for the group of two there is one correlation coefficient. Suppose, hypothetically, you had perfect information about these groups so there is no uncertainty about the values of the correlations. How would one go about determining whether these two groups have "different" correlations?
May
7
comment Random Sampling
Welcome to our site, Gary! We do invite homework questions, but--as explained in our faq--we expect such questions to show partial work towards a solution and to make a focused inquiry concerning the point where you are stuck. If you edit this question following those guidelines we will be glad to reopen it.
May
7
comment Bound on the variance for [0,1] RVs as a function of the mean
There is a much, much simpler proof which is fully general: since $V[X]+E[X]^2$ = $E[X^2]$ and $|X|\le 1$, it is obvious that $E[X^2]\le E[1\cdot X] = E[X]$ and the result follows upon subtracting $E[X]^2$. (This is a trivial instance of Holder's Inequality, inter alia.) It can also be seen as an application of the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality.
May
7
comment Relationship between mutual information and change of variables
It's a direct consequence of the change of variables relationship for multiple integrals.
May
7
comment What distribution does my data follow?
We are seeing Stigler's Law of Eponymy in action. :-)
May
7
comment Normalize a periodic parameter
What's the matter with just allowing $\theta$ to lie in $[0, 360]$?
May
6
comment Comparing correlations between two groups
Could you expand on what it would mean to "compare" two different correlation matrices of different sizes? What is the intended interpretation?
May
6
comment How do I identify the “Long Tail” portion of my distribution?
You might appreciate this recent answer showing ways to identify modes in a distribution. Also of interest is this thread on 1D clustering. Searching our site on "clustering" is also likely to be fruitful.
May
6
comment Optimizing a Poisson Process
BTW, if you replace [; and ;] by $ your $\TeX$ expressions will be nicely rendered.
May
6
comment Optimizing a Poisson Process
You might want to think along the following lines: define "up front" to mean that you are within the first $M$ people in line (let your partner determine $M$ before you go out). You need to attach a cost to waiting and a cost to failing to be among the first $M$. Your distributional assumptions on arrival times translate into a distribution of the sum of those costs. You might want to arrive at the gate at a time of least expected cost. This is only one of many possible formulations of this problem--you need to work out what the problem really is before you ask it!
May
6
comment Why are $x$ and $x^2$ correlated?
If you plot $x^2$ versus $x$ you obtain, of course, a portion of a parabola. When the distribution of $x$ is away from zero, the correlation is measuring the linearity of one arm of that parabola: it looks more and more linear the further from zero you get compared to the range of the values. When the distribution of $x$ is symmetric around zero, the parabola is clearly curved. That's all that's going on.
May
6
comment Why are $x$ and $x^2$ correlated?
Simulate some data with $x$ symmetrically spaced around $0$ and try again :-).
May
6
comment Asymptotic probability concerning the largest absolute value in an iid Gaussian sample
I believe that the Mills ratio for the standard Normal distribution will reveal what you want to know: look at its continued fraction.
May
6
comment Optimizing a Poisson Process
Your model is missing key information its formulation. If you show up at time $0$, you don't get to the front and so you fail to meet your objective--but there's nothing in the model that actually states, much less quantifies, your objective (of being "up front"). If you show up $1000$ hours before the concert, maybe you're at the front but you wait a long time. You need to quantify what you're trying to achieve and you need to be more explicit about the assumptions you are making.