| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 2 months |
| seen | yesterday | |
| stats | profile views | 10 |
|
Mar 18 |
comment |
The multiple regression model - The minimum sum of squares The `rank' of M is a scalar. Intuitively it is the size of the basis of independent vectors used to describe M. You come to this conclusion by realizing that M = M dot M. |
|
Mar 18 |
comment |
The multiple regression model - The minimum sum of squares M = (I − X(X′X)^{−1}X′) |
|
Mar 17 |
answered | The multiple regression model - The minimum sum of squares |
|
Jan 26 |
answered | classifiers providing probability of being correct |
|
Jun 8 |
revised |
Neural networks vs support vector machines: are the second definitely superior? added 21 characters in body |
|
Jun 8 |
answered | Neural networks vs support vector machines: are the second definitely superior? |
|
Apr 27 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Mar 4 |
comment |
How to know when to stop reducing dimensions with PCA? Right you're very correct. It is highly dependent on that assumption. Discarding any of the nonsingular eigenvectors requires making assumptions about the manifold that the data lies in. If there isn't a extreme class imbalance then it is reasonable to assume that a low-dimensional manifold will describe the relevant signal. |
|
Mar 3 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Mar 3 |
revised |
How to know when to stop reducing dimensions with PCA? edited body |
|
Mar 3 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Mar 3 |
revised |
How to know when to stop reducing dimensions with PCA? deleted 6 characters in body |
|
Mar 3 |
answered | How to know when to stop reducing dimensions with PCA? |
|
Mar 2 |
awarded | Student |
|
Mar 2 |
asked | Graphical nominal model |