3
$\begingroup$

I was looking at AR processes in Chris Brooks (2008) and at one point, when deriving the variance of an AR(1) process he writes this part $(1- \phi L)^{-1}* u_{t}$ as $(1+ \phi L+\phi^{2}L + \cdots)* u_{t}$ but I do not understand why. It might be a rather basic question but I would really appreciate if you could at least point me in the right direction.

Thank you!

Photo from the book here.

Equation 5.86 page 220 if you want to have a look.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

6
$\begingroup$

Lukasz's answer is correct. Just to elaborate:

Quick review of geometric series

Finite geometric series ($g_k = 1 + r^2 + r^3 + \ldots + r^k$):

  • Let $r$ be some scalar.
  • Let $g_k$ be a geometric series of $r$, that is, $g_k = \sum_{j=0}^k r^j = 1 + r + r^2 + \ldots + r^k$

Observe that $g_{k+1} = g_k + r^{k+1}$ and that $g_{k+1} = 1 + r g_k$. Equating the two sides:

$$g_k + r^{k+1} = 1 + rg_k $$

Then some simple algebra gives us:

$$g_k = \frac{1 - r^{k+1}}{1 - r}$$

Infinite geometric series ($k=\infty$):

If $|r| < 1$ then the limit of $g_k$ as $k\rightarrow \infty$ exists:

$$ \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1 - r^{k+1}}{1 - r} = \frac{1}{1-r}$$

To recap, if $|r| < 1$ then: $$ 1 + r + r^2 + r^3 + \ldots = (1-r)^{-1}$$

Time series, lag polynomials, and geometric series

If we have some time series process:

$$ y_t = \phi y_{t-1} + u_t $$

We can write this with the lag operator as: $$\left( 1 - \phi L \right) y_t = u_t $$

Some manipulation (yes this is allowed, if the lag polynomial is invertible): $$y_t = \left(1 - \phi L \right)^{-1} u_t$$

Our previous results of geometric series turns out to hold here as well. For $|\phi| < 1$ we have:

$$ \left(1 - \phi L \right)^{-1} = 1 + \phi L + \phi^2 L^2 + \phi^3 L^3 + \ldots $$

Hence: \begin{align*} y_t &= \left(1 + \phi L + \phi^2 L^2 + \phi^3 L^3 + \ldots \right) u_t \\ &= u_t + \phi u_{t-1} + \phi^2 u_{t-2} + \phi^3 u_{t-3} + \ldots \end{align*}

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Exceptional answer! $\endgroup$ Feb 9, 2017 at 15:26
1
$\begingroup$

Because the sum telescopes

$$1 = \frac{(1 - xL)}{(1 - xL)} = (1 + xL + x^2L^2 + \dots)(1 - xL) = 1 -xL + xL - x^2L^2 + x^2L^2 \dots = 1$$

Note: we need $x < 1$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.