Timeline for Now that I've rejected the null hypothesis what's next?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2017 at 23:39 | answer | added | David Lane | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 28, 2014 at 23:14 | vote | accept | PhD | ||
| May 28, 2014 at 13:59 | answer | added | Christian Sauer | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 28, 2014 at 7:12 | comment | added | Glen_b | Generally speaking, your actions after your decision should also be chosen before you test (how else can you weigh up the costs of the two kinds of errors and so choose a sensible $\alpha$?). At the least, you would likely move to consideration of estimated effect sizes. The null is not tenable (by criteria you chose - if that's not sufficient for you, what would be?), so what values are plausible instead? e.g. in your indicated test, what values for $\mu_1-\mu_0$ would be reasonably plausible, given the data? | |
| May 28, 2014 at 4:12 | comment | added | gung - Reinstate Monica | Possibly of interest: Why is "statistically significant" not enough? | |
| May 28, 2014 at 4:04 | answer | added | gung - Reinstate Monica | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 28, 2014 at 1:42 | answer | added | jona | timeline score: 11 | |
| May 28, 2014 at 1:20 | answer | added | Nick Stauner | timeline score: 10 | |
| May 28, 2014 at 0:45 | history | edited | PhD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| May 27, 2014 at 23:44 | history | asked | PhD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |