Timeline for How to read the results of Dunn's test?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2015 at 19:03 | comment | added | Alexis |
@GennaroTedesco kruskal.test does not adjust for ties, while dunn.test does adjust for ties. As it says in the documentation... just above where it give the email to contact for support questions.
|
|
| Sep 21, 2015 at 8:35 | comment | added | gented |
I have seen that the Kruskal-Wallis values obtained with kruskal.test slightly differ from the ones obtained with the option kw=TRUE in the above package. Is this due to some approximations or are they two different things?
|
|
| Jan 26, 2015 at 18:39 | comment | added | Alexis | @pocketlizard See family-wise error rate and false discovery rate. | |
| Jan 26, 2015 at 17:42 | comment | added | pocketlizard | Sorry if this is taking the question in a different direction, but when would you adjust the test? What criteria are necessary in your data for you to want to choose an adjustment? | |
| Dec 6, 2014 at 3:03 | history | edited | Alexis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Dec 6, 2014 at 2:24 | vote | accept | bubbalouie | ||
| Dec 5, 2014 at 22:24 | history | answered | Alexis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |