Timeline for Confidence interval for sample $\{x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4\} = \{5,10,6,7\}$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stats.stackexchange.com/ with https://stats.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 13, 2014 at 5:56 | vote | accept | grayQuant | ||
| Dec 12, 2014 at 9:46 | comment | added | Tim | @MichaelMayer but it is like you said that you are almost certainly sure (>99.99% sure) that your results are exactly right because you got $p<0.001$... That is a dangerous oversimplification. | |
| Dec 12, 2014 at 9:35 | comment | added | Michael M | @Tim: That is of course right. But statistical reports would look quite funny when no abbreviations would be allowed. | |
| Dec 12, 2014 at 9:09 | comment | added | Tim | @MichaelMayer that interpretation could be misleading (as COOLSerdash noticed), see e.g.: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/124113/… | |
| Dec 12, 2014 at 9:01 | history | edited | COOLSerdash | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1348 characters in body
|
| Dec 12, 2014 at 8:46 | comment | added | Michael M | The standard interpretation would be something like this: "We claim with 95% certainty that the true average $\mu$ is between 4.06 and 9.94." | |
| Dec 12, 2014 at 8:40 | history | answered | COOLSerdash | CC BY-SA 3.0 |