Skip to main content

Timeline for Covariance and independence?

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 23, 2023 at 2:21 comment added whuber @Dilip That's why I specified that the absolute third moment must be finite.
Mar 22, 2023 at 19:34 comment added whuber @Dilip Note, though, that the zero third moment is an immediate consequence of symmetry and a zero mean, making this example more general than it might appear. A distribution with these properties can be generated from any starting distribution with finite absolute third moment simply by symmetrizing it, giving arbitrarily rich examples.
S Feb 12, 2022 at 14:55 history suggested Lycanthropeus CC BY-SA 4.0
Improved formatting by adding square brackets.
Feb 12, 2022 at 3:57 review Suggested edits
S Feb 12, 2022 at 14:55
Feb 16, 2012 at 8:25 comment added mpiktas @DilipSarwate, thanks, I've edited my answer accordingly. When I wrote it I though about normal variables, for them zero third moment follows from zero mean.
Feb 16, 2012 at 8:23 history edited mpiktas CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 characters in body
Feb 16, 2012 at 3:09 comment added Dilip Sarwate +1 but as a minor nitpick, you do need to assume that $E[X^3] = 0$ separately (it does not follow from the assumption of symmetry of the distribution or from $E[X] = 0$), so that we don't have issues such as $E[X^3]$ working out to be of the form $\infty - \infty$. And I am queasy about @ocram's assertion that "a N(0,1) rv and a chi2(1) rv are uncorrelated." (emphasis added) Yes, $X \sim N(0,1)$ and $X^2 \sim \chi^2(1)$ are uncorrelated, but not any $N(0,1)$ and $\chi^2(1)$ random variables.
Jul 15, 2011 at 8:21 comment added ocram I like that example too. As a particular case, a N(0,1) rv and a chi2(1) rv are uncorrelated.
Jul 15, 2011 at 8:18 history answered mpiktas CC BY-SA 3.0