Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackStats/status/572682025683066880
added 1 character in body
Source Link
ttnphns
  • 58.8k
  • 53
  • 287
  • 512

I am trying to understand the value Cramer's V provides.

I found the following sentence (from here):

"V may be viewed as the association between two variables as a percentage of their maximum possible variation. V2V^2 is the mean square canonical correlation between the variables."

But I don't think I fully understand it.

Can someone please help explain it a bit further (or with a more detailed example)?

I am trying to understand the value Cramer's V provides.

I found the following sentence (from here):

"V may be viewed as the association between two variables as a percentage of their maximum possible variation. V2 is the mean square canonical correlation between the variables."

But I don't think I fully understand it.

Can someone please help explain it a bit further (or with a more detailed example)?

I am trying to understand the value Cramer's V provides.

I found the following sentence (from here):

"V may be viewed as the association between two variables as a percentage of their maximum possible variation. V^2 is the mean square canonical correlation between the variables."

But I don't think I fully understand it.

Can someone please help explain it a bit further (or with a more detailed example)?

added tag; light editing; removed thanks
Source Link
gung - Reinstate Monica
  • 147.5k
  • 89
  • 406
  • 717

I am trying to understand the value Cramer's V provides.

I found the following sentence (from here):

"V may be viewed as the association between two variables as a percentage of their maximum possible variation. V2 is the mean square canonical correlation between the variables."

But I don't think I fully understand it.

Can someone please help explain it a bit further? (or with a more detailed example)

Thanks.?

I am trying to understand the value Cramer's V provides.

I found the following sentence (from here):

"V may be viewed as the association between two variables as a percentage of their maximum possible variation. V2 is the mean square canonical correlation between the variables."

But I don't think I fully understand it.

Can someone please help explain it a bit further? (or with a more detailed example)

Thanks.

I am trying to understand the value Cramer's V provides.

I found the following sentence (from here):

"V may be viewed as the association between two variables as a percentage of their maximum possible variation. V2 is the mean square canonical correlation between the variables."

But I don't think I fully understand it.

Can someone please help explain it a bit further (or with a more detailed example)?

Source Link
Tal Galili
  • 21.9k
  • 36
  • 147
  • 208

Interpretation of Cramér's V

I am trying to understand the value Cramer's V provides.

I found the following sentence (from here):

"V may be viewed as the association between two variables as a percentage of their maximum possible variation. V2 is the mean square canonical correlation between the variables."

But I don't think I fully understand it.

Can someone please help explain it a bit further? (or with a more detailed example)

Thanks.