Timeline for Simulate from a truncated mixture normal distribution
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stats.stackexchange.com/ with https://stats.stackexchange.com/
|
|
May 11, 2015 at 21:15 | comment | added | mjnichol | @user777 a Truncated Gaussian mixture has a different distribution from a Beta distribution and cannot be swapped out just because you can enforce symmetry and the same support. | |
Mar 24, 2015 at 8:59 | history | edited | Silverfish | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo in title
|
Mar 23, 2015 at 19:04 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackStats/status/580082591413477377 | ||
Mar 23, 2015 at 17:05 | history | edited | Xi'an | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 31 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
Mar 23, 2015 at 16:04 | review | First posts | |||
Mar 23, 2015 at 16:07 | |||||
Mar 23, 2015 at 15:30 | answer | added | Xi'an | timeline score: 16 | |
Mar 23, 2015 at 14:53 | comment | added | Elvis | If you don’t need your simulations to be very fast, you can do it using rejection sampling: (1) sample $x$ from the mixture of two normals, (2) if $x$ is not in $[0,1]$, go back to step 1, (3) output $x$. (but user777 is right, do you have a good reason to chose this distribution instead of a mixture of betas?) | |
Mar 23, 2015 at 14:45 | comment | added | Sycorax♦ | If it's on the unit interval, why not use betas instead of normals? For $\alpha=\beta>1$, the distribution is symmetric and unimodal and bounded on the unit interval. | |
Mar 23, 2015 at 14:21 | history | asked | Alexy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |