Timeline for Interpretation of Matern cluster point pattern process intensity function equation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2015 at 23:14 | comment | added | Ege Rubak | Sounds like you got it right. | |
| Aug 13, 2015 at 16:46 | comment | added | Scortchi♦ | Andy's comment got truncated: the end was: "are then removed, VS. the idea that once you have the intensity constructed and you want to model the intensity function, you go to each location to evaluate and look "around" it. Am I on base with this?" | |
| Aug 13, 2015 at 15:38 | comment | added | Andy Lister | and thanks -- so for clarification, the intensity function is thus location centered -- for a given offspring point, the count of parent points "around" it is made (the indicator function), and then one multiplies this count by the average intensity to get the "local intensity"? This seems to make intuitive sense to me. My confusion seems to arise from there being the "construction method" of the process -- where the parents are created, disks of radius R are created, and then the second subsample of a Poisson process is made and put within the circle (lambda_c) and the parents are then remove | |
| Aug 13, 2015 at 8:01 | history | answered | Ege Rubak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |