Timeline for With complete data and a factored prior, the posterior also factors
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2016 at 9:11 | answer | added | Xi'an | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 31, 2016 at 9:02 | comment | added | Set | @Xi'an just added parentheses around the independence of $\mu_1$ and $\mu_2$, I forgot to add that, that may make your interpretation of what I was trying to say different, my apologies. | |
| Jan 31, 2016 at 8:57 | history | edited | Set | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Jan 31, 2016 at 8:56 | comment | added | Set | is the quote I cited by the author also wrong? I'm sorry I'm just very confused at this point. | |
| Jan 31, 2016 at 8:53 | comment | added | Set | @Xi'an as far as I can tell my book is telling me it is, as per figure 11.9 on page 345 (section 11.3). And it makes sense intuitively that it would be, since how can knowing $\mu_2$ affect my knowledge of $\mu_1$ when $x_1$ is fixed? | |
| Jan 31, 2016 at 8:51 | history | edited | Set | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Jan 31, 2016 at 8:41 | comment | added | Set | @Xi'an, do you mean my graphical model does not encode this independence, or that my example doesn't? | |
| Jan 31, 2016 at 8:25 | history | asked | Set | CC BY-SA 3.0 |