Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 29, 2023 at 3:12 answer added jeremysprofile timeline score: 0
Jan 8, 2023 at 22:46 answer added user377098 timeline score: 0
Mar 2, 2021 at 17:27 comment added Alexis @whuber You would also have to assume history did not exist, and that spotting a single male frog in a plurality of frogs was not evidence that that lone male frog had successfully sought out a female frog. There's all kinds of connoted assumptions about inter-sex relations as well, but those are possibly less germane to the probabilistic portion of the riddle.
Mar 2, 2021 at 16:17 answer added philosofool timeline score: 0
Oct 3, 2018 at 7:41 answer added bobbel timeline score: 1
Oct 3, 2018 at 7:17 answer added tomciopp timeline score: 4
Jan 26, 2017 at 16:54 comment added Tim Greenberg The TED-Ed frog riddle answer is wrong. There is a very detailed answer here: duckware.com/tedfrog
Apr 2, 2016 at 20:54 answer added pit847 timeline score: 1
Apr 1, 2016 at 11:23 answer added Not Real Bright timeline score: 0
Apr 1, 2016 at 2:41 answer added pit847 timeline score: -4
Mar 15, 2016 at 22:43 comment added whuber It seems to me that one has to make strong assumptions in order to obtain any answer. E.g., supposing male frogs croak only in the presence of a female, you would obtain one answer; but supposing that they tend to croak in the presence of another male, you would obtain a different answer (and make a different decision). Or what if females are not gregarious and tend to avoid other frogs? You would make yet a third decision. Although it's clearly intended that you ignore all such considerations, contemplating them may help you understand why the odds you compute are not necessarily 50:50.
Mar 13, 2016 at 23:53 answer added dsaxton timeline score: 4
Mar 13, 2016 at 23:40 answer added mb7744 timeline score: 4
Mar 13, 2016 at 23:29 history edited Jernau CC BY-SA 3.0
added 974 characters in body; added 11 characters in body; added 4 characters in body
Mar 13, 2016 at 23:11 comment added dsaxton Can you restate the riddle here so readers don't have to follow the link (which also may break in the future) and then watch a video?
Mar 13, 2016 at 23:07 history asked Jernau CC BY-SA 3.0