Timeline for Can a statistic depend on a parameter?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2016 at 14:57 | vote | accept | An old man in the sea. | ||
| Mar 25, 2016 at 20:58 | comment | added | An old man in the sea. | From the comments of @whuber I think that point was more that $\Theta_0$ (values under the null) are not the values of the population, which, granted are not known, cannot change the distribution of the population. | |
| Mar 25, 2016 at 1:49 | comment | added | dsaxton | I tried to reword my answer, is that a bit more clear? | |
| Mar 25, 2016 at 1:48 | history | edited | dsaxton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 62 characters in body
|
| Mar 24, 2016 at 22:07 | comment | added | An old man in the sea. | dsxaton would you like to complete your answer with some of whuber info on his comments? That way, I can accept your answer | |
| Mar 24, 2016 at 20:45 | comment | added | An old man in the sea. | Thanks for your answer dsxaton. what's your definition for parameter? also, what do you mean for hypothesized value? | |
| Mar 24, 2016 at 18:31 | comment | added | whuber♦ | This could be confusing because $\mu_0$ is not normally considered a parameter of the distribution of $x$. The distinction between "hypothesized value" of a parameter and the value of the parameter itself may be less clear than you intended. | |
| Mar 24, 2016 at 18:28 | history | answered | dsaxton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |