Timeline for Why P>0.5 cutoff is not "optimal" for logistic regression?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2016 at 16:06 | vote | accept | felix000 | ||
| Aug 1, 2016 at 0:24 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackStats/status/759907651647967237 | ||
| Jul 28, 2016 at 12:28 | history | edited | Tim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jul 28, 2016 at 11:54 | history | reopened |
Tim gung - Reinstate Monica Scortchi♦ |
||
| Jul 28, 2016 at 11:26 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jul 28, 2016 at 11:58 | |||||
| Jul 28, 2016 at 11:13 | history | edited | Tim |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 28, 2016 at 11:08 | history | edited | Scortchi♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added some extra material from duplicate.
|
| Jul 28, 2016 at 11:04 | comment | added | Scortchi♦ | Sorry, I didn't mean they all answered your q., but I thought they were all relevant in suggesting not using accuracy at any cut-off as a performance metric, or at least not an arbitrary cut-off not calculated from a utility function. | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 20:10 | history | closed |
Sycorax♦ user82102 COOLSerdash Greenparker Robert Long |
Duplicate of How do you report percentage accuracy for glmnet logistic regression? | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 20:04 | comment | added | felix000 | Scortchi, could you possibly be a bit more specific as to which question about cutoffs you think is relevant? I didn't see the relevant question or answer before I posted, nor now. | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 19:58 | history | edited | felix000 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 202 characters in body; edited title
|
| Jul 27, 2016 at 15:53 | answer | added | gung - Reinstate Monica | timeline score: 17 | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 13:34 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 27, 2016 at 20:15 | |||||
| Jul 27, 2016 at 12:05 | comment | added | Scortchi♦ | See stats.stackexchange.com/search?q=user%3A4253+cutoff | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 11:47 | answer | added | user124690 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 27, 2016 at 9:12 | history | edited | felix000 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
a bit more information
|
| Jul 27, 2016 at 8:13 | history | asked | felix000 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |