Timeline for Linear model vs general linear model
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 7, 2021 at 2:54 | answer | added | Lakshman | timeline score: 0 | |
Sep 6, 2016 at 15:52 | comment | added | Glen_b |
I put your links in the question (they should be there rather than in comments). I also attempted to add the general-linear-model tag but it remaps to multiple-regression (this is unfortunate, to my mind because the general linear model is more general than multiple regression as usually written).
|
|
Sep 6, 2016 at 15:50 | vote | accept | user_anon | ||
Sep 6, 2016 at 15:48 | history | edited | Glen_b | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body; edited tags
|
Sep 6, 2016 at 15:46 | comment | added | user_anon | Linear and general linear models. | |
Sep 6, 2016 at 15:41 | comment | added | Glen_b | If you quote wikipedia, you should normally actually quote it and link to the sections the quote comes from (or at the least, link to the sections you're discussing even if you don't quote). Note that different articles are contributed to by different people and they don't always have the same take on the same topic. | |
Sep 6, 2016 at 15:34 | comment | added | mdewey | You are missing some elements from Wikipedia which (a) defines general as being about a possibly multivariate outcome (b) allows for the X to receive a transformation in the linear definition but for some reason not in the other one. | |
Sep 6, 2016 at 15:03 | comment | added | user_anon | I looked on wikipedia and saw the formulae as I wrote them above. | |
Sep 6, 2016 at 15:00 | comment | added | Glen_b | What would make your first formula "general"? I assume you have reversed the labels from your intent. | |
Sep 6, 2016 at 14:56 | answer | added | Glen_b | timeline score: 3 | |
Sep 6, 2016 at 14:53 | comment | added | Ian_Fin | Do you have a specific context in mind? The terms are often used interchangeably | |
Sep 6, 2016 at 14:50 | history | asked | user_anon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |