Your scaling will need to take into account the possible range of the original number. There is a difference if your 200 could have been in the range [200,201] or in [0,200] or in [0,10000].
So let
- $r_{\text{min}}$ denote the minimum of the range of your measurement
- $r_{\text{max}}$ denote the minimummaximum of the range of your measurement
- $t_{\text{min}}$ denote the minimum of the range of your desired target scaling
- $t_{\text{max}}$ denote the minimummaximum of the range of your desired target scaling
- $m\in[r_{\text{min}},r_{\text{max}}]$ denote your measurement to be scaled
Then
$$ m\mapsto \frac{m-r_{\text{min}}}{r_{\text{max}}-r_{\text{min}}}\times (t_{\text{max}}-t_{\text{min}}) + t_{\text{min}}$$
will scale $m$ linearly into $[t_{\text{min}},t_{\text{max}}]$ as desired.
To go step by step,
- $ m\mapsto m-r_{\text{min}}$ maps $m$ to $[0,r_{\text{max}}-r_{\text{min}}]$.
- Next, $$ m\mapsto \frac{m-r_{\text{min}}}{r_{\text{max}}-r_{\text{min}}} $$
maps $m$ to the interval $[0,1]$, with $m=r_{\text{min}}$ mapped to $0$ and $m=r_{\text{max}}$ mapped to $1$.
Multiplying this by $(t_{\text{max}}-t_{\text{min}})$ maps $m$ to $[0,t_{\text{max}}-t_{\text{min}}]$.
Finally, adding $t_{\text{min}}$ shifts everything and maps $m$ to $[t_{\text{min}},t_{\text{max}}]$ as desired.