Timeline for Understanding the mixed effect model thru creating my own optimization-based model
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stats.stackexchange.com/ with https://stats.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Jun 25, 2012 at 23:36 | comment | added | Macro | minimize as a function of...? If it's a function of the ${\bf b}$'s then clearly the answer is to make them all $0$. What are the weights? | |
Jun 25, 2012 at 23:34 | comment | added | Luna | Thank you so much Macro for your help! It looks great now! Depending the answer to my Q4, if my understanding of the b's is correct, then I guess I wanted to minimize the sum of the weighted sum of squared b's (if b's are indeed the distance between the overall intercept and the group-wise intercepts) and the weighted sum of the squared (within-group) residuals... | |
Jun 25, 2012 at 23:27 | history | edited | Luna | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
Jun 25, 2012 at 21:06 | comment | added | Macro | Luna, I tried to fix this up so that it is readable (in its previous state it was extremely difficult to tell what was being asked). I tried to transcribe your estimating equation verbatim but I'm not sure I did it correctly since what is there now is difficult to make sense of - what argument is being minimized over? The $w$s? Do the fixed effects, ${\boldsymbol \beta}$, come into play anywhere? | |
Jun 25, 2012 at 21:05 | history | edited | Macro | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 68 characters in body
|
Jun 25, 2012 at 20:59 | history | edited | Macro | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 148 characters in body; deleted 54 characters in body
|
Jun 25, 2012 at 16:19 | history | asked | Luna | CC BY-SA 3.0 |