Timeline for How to handle data imbalance in Principal Component Analysis?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 13, 2012 at 14:32 | vote | accept | zca0 | ||
Jul 7, 2012 at 21:25 | answer | added | Michael R. Chernick | timeline score: 0 | |
Jul 7, 2012 at 10:43 | comment | added | ttnphns | Is the essence of your question this: There's a multivariate data presumably heterogeneous due to presence of clusters (groups) in it; the clusters are not known, so discriminant analysis is not applicable. Is it then possible to use PCA in place of it, to differentiate the groups? If yes, how to make PCA maximally effective for this discriminative task? Etc. What I recommend you is to rework this and the other (just next) your questions and merge them into one question. | |
Jul 7, 2012 at 10:00 | comment | added | zca0 | Thanks. I have edited it. The question should be more clearly now. | |
Jul 7, 2012 at 9:59 | history | edited | zca0 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 462 characters in body
|
Jul 7, 2012 at 9:38 | history | edited | chl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
Jul 7, 2012 at 9:28 | comment | added | ttnphns |
Let me ask you to clarify and detail your question. First, what is "imbalance"? Groups of very different n or else? So, do you have your sample split into groups or not? Second, PCA (?)tries to keep the most discrimination power rather than keep most variations seems to contradict with PCA trying to keep most variations in data set . Please, elucidate.
|
|
Jul 7, 2012 at 9:05 | history | asked | zca0 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |