Skip to main content
25 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 8, 2018 at 7:17 history edited FabioSpaghetti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 444 characters in body
Aug 6, 2018 at 12:55 vote accept FabioSpaghetti
Aug 6, 2018 at 12:24 comment added whuber Please read stats.stackexchange.com/questions/4220
Aug 6, 2018 at 12:11 answer added Sextus Empiricus timeline score: 3
Aug 6, 2018 at 11:48 comment added FabioSpaghetti Let us continue this discussion in chat.
Aug 6, 2018 at 11:47 history edited FabioSpaghetti CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 330 characters in body
Aug 6, 2018 at 11:45 comment added FabioSpaghetti Thanks a lot for your effective edits,should I accept them ?
Aug 6, 2018 at 11:44 history edited Sextus Empiricus CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 229 characters in body
Aug 6, 2018 at 11:42 comment added FabioSpaghetti Are you able to do a favor to me, and edit the code ? now What I am not sure is which parts of the code are not needed to generate those plot, I believe all is needed
Aug 6, 2018 at 11:40 comment added FabioSpaghetti @MartijnWeterings I am very sorry! It had to be replaced with rw.small, cause rw.small was random , but I had to exert it on my data ! now it should work
Aug 6, 2018 at 11:39 history edited FabioSpaghetti CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 30 characters in body
Aug 6, 2018 at 11:21 comment added FabioSpaghetti @MartijnWeterings You are right , I did not have to accept yet. Ok the problem is that I thought that I only should re scale the graph to see more of it, but changing the len and maximum xi in the line I mentioned above, not only I re scaled the graph but I was also changing its values. This is my problem. I wish I was clear enough. I had fitdistr in my code, I added it now
Aug 6, 2018 at 11:19 history edited FabioSpaghetti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 48 characters in body
Aug 6, 2018 at 11:18 comment added Sextus Empiricus "The problem is when I change the second and third argument , I mean : 1650000 and len=5000 to for example 9650000, len=5000 , the peaks position also displace and don't remain in the same place so it's not only a re scaling the graph" I don't see the problem. Can you explain it more. (also, is this question answered or not?, you have accepted the answer below, but you have made additional questions in the comments afterwards)
Aug 6, 2018 at 7:10 comment added FabioSpaghetti @MartijnWeterings Thank you very much, I updated my question please check it
Aug 6, 2018 at 7:06 history edited FabioSpaghetti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2810 characters in body
Aug 6, 2018 at 6:17 vote accept FabioSpaghetti
Aug 6, 2018 at 11:19
Aug 6, 2018 at 0:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackStats/status/1026256701929005056
Aug 5, 2018 at 22:10 comment added Sextus Empiricus Note that small values for a pdf are perfectly fine. It is a probability density function, which will be lower if the total probability (the integrated total/mass/area will be 1) is spread out over a longer range events.
Aug 5, 2018 at 21:58 comment added Sextus Empiricus "I still get" that is because you still didn't scale it properly enough. This still seems to be just a matter of making the graphs. Scale the graphs differently and you will be able to align them with the left graphs in your Weibull results overview (these have more on the x-scale, showing more of the entire curve, and less on the, taller, y-scale making the curve less flat). If after correct scaling you still do not get a good result, then show your (reproducible) code or otherwise it will be difficult to see what else could have gone wrong (it isn't clear how the code in the link is used).
Aug 5, 2018 at 21:36 history edited FabioSpaghetti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 193 characters in body
Aug 5, 2018 at 21:29 history edited FabioSpaghetti CC BY-SA 4.0
added 205 characters in body
Aug 5, 2018 at 21:21 history edited Alexis CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 1 character in body
Aug 5, 2018 at 21:20 answer added Alexis timeline score: 7
Aug 5, 2018 at 21:16 history asked FabioSpaghetti CC BY-SA 4.0