Timeline for Conditional Expectation / Estimator Confusion
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2012 at 22:59 | comment | added | whuber♦ | Now I'm convinced :-). | |
| Oct 23, 2012 at 22:12 | comment | added | gui11aume | @whuber actually thinking about it, I stick to my point (see the edit). Did I get something wrong? | |
| Oct 23, 2012 at 22:11 | history | edited | gui11aume | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 677 characters in body
|
| Oct 23, 2012 at 21:01 | history | edited | gui11aume | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Oct 23, 2012 at 21:01 | comment | added | gui11aume | @whuber absolutely. My bad. By the way, I like your geometric answer (to the duplicate of that question) better :D | |
| Oct 23, 2012 at 20:58 | comment | added | whuber♦ | Umm... I'm pretty sure that $T$ has three degrees of freedom, not two. Not that it matters--everything is conditioned on $T$. But maybe I misunderstand the notation. All the work depends on justifying that assertion about the joint distribution. | |
| Oct 23, 2012 at 20:56 | history | post merged (destination) | |||
| Oct 23, 2012 at 20:28 | history | answered | gui11aume | CC BY-SA 3.0 |