Timeline for How do I interpret significant results in meta-regression?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 12, 2019 at 8:34 | vote | accept | Josee Luis | ||
Jul 12, 2019 at 8:02 | comment | added | Josee Luis | @user2974951Thank you for your reply! How about the p-value in older kids group? Where can I find this information? Thanks! | |
Jul 11, 2019 at 12:22 | answer | added | user2974951 | timeline score: 2 | |
Jul 11, 2019 at 6:46 | comment | added | Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai | My interpretation is simply that you estimates correctly and beyond random variability the effect of your study (I guess a treatment) in older subjects... This is what the intercept tells you... | |
S Jul 11, 2019 at 6:39 | history | edited | mkt | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Edited title
|
S Jul 11, 2019 at 6:39 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improved question fomat and changed tags.
|
Jul 11, 2019 at 6:14 | comment | added | user2974951 |
If you specified it as you claim, then yes, the intercept is the base value for the older kids. For the younger kids the estimate is intrcpt + participantsyounger kids .
|
|
Jul 11, 2019 at 5:36 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 11, 2019 at 6:39 | |||||
S Jul 11, 2019 at 2:17 | history | suggested | Mihai Chelaru | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improved grammar and formatting
|
Jul 10, 2019 at 21:42 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 11, 2019 at 2:17 | |||||
Jul 10, 2019 at 21:34 | history | asked | Josee Luis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |